DIYHiFi.org

For the sake of audio
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 1:41 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 8:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
Hi guys,
I tried several hours to find an IV converter but I only found one for this DAC. Somebody can help me for this?
I would like to found a discrete iv without feedback and coupling cap. Thank you! Maxpou


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Aug 26, 2010 10:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 5:26 pm
Posts: 512
Location: Nova Scotia
Oh look, someone wants their work done for them.

Please do the following:

- Find as many discrete, no-coupling-cap, no-feedback I/V circuits as you can. Pick out a few which have the level of complexity and feature set that you want.
- For each of these, take note of the DAC chip that they're designed to be used with, and the DAC's output current and voltage compliance range. Compare that to the 1794/98. The 1794, especially, has a fairly high output current and you'll probably have to tweak the I/V circuit to work with it.
- For that experimentation, get yourself a copy of LTspice (it's free) and learn how to use it.

If all you do is build a schematic you find online, all you get good at is building schematics.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 10:35 pm
Posts: 15
Here is one but it has an outputcap,maybee sommething to build from?
http://rockgrotto.proboards.com/index.c ... 653&page=1
I´m thinking of trying this later on myself (PCM1794),but if you find one without the cap please post it.

_________________
My first class A-amp is built.SEWA is the name,more to come..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
gmarsh wrote:
Oh look, someone wants their work done for them.

Please do the following:

- Find as many discrete, no-coupling-cap, no-feedback I/V circuits as you can. Pick out a few which have the level of complexity and feature set that you want.
- For each of these, take note of the DAC chip that they're designed to be used with, and the DAC's output current and voltage compliance range. Compare that to the 1794/98. The 1794, especially, has a fairly high output current and you'll probably have to tweak the I/V circuit to work with it.
- For that experimentation, get yourself a copy of LTspice (it's free) and learn how to use it.

If all you do is build a schematic you find online, all you get good at is building schematics.


Hi gmarsh,
the problem is i don't know how output current of DAC work. I know that a differential as Ryssen propose is OK ( thank you for your link) but what the difference with this one ( topology )? Maxpou


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:46 pm
Posts: 97
Location: Toronto
Stay simple.

From someone else here:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/6121-easy-build-i-v-stage.html

It is worth understanding this circuit.

Someday, I'll build this, but I've got two headphone amps on my desk to build first.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 3:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
erik_s wrote:
Stay simple.

From someone else here:
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/digital-source/6121-easy-build-i-v-stage.html

It is worth understanding this circuit.

Someday, I'll build this, but I've got two headphone amps on my desk to build first.


Hi erik_s,
I know this circuit but I have differential current ouput, i can't use this circuit unless i built two of them for each channel. Maxpou


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 6:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:46 pm
Posts: 97
Location: Toronto
maxpou wrote:
I know this circuit but I have differential current ouput, i can't use this circuit unless i built two of them for each channel. Maxpou


And your problem is?

The datasheet circuit for the PCM1794 is an I/V stage followed by a differential to SE stage. Any reason why you can't do the same?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 8:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
erik_s wrote:
maxpou wrote:
I know this circuit but I have differential current ouput, i can't use this circuit unless i built two of them for each channel. Maxpou


And your problem is?

The datasheet circuit for the PCM1794 is an I/V stage followed by a differential to SE stage. Any reason why you can't do the same?


erik,
do you have tried the difference between the IV resistor stage and I don't know the name but the same topology in second post? Almost all circuits that I found use this topology and not the IV resistor. It's the reason why i would like to use it.

question: the equation in 19 page of datasheet Vi= 7.8mA*Rf Rf is the IV resistor?

Thank you! maxpou


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 10:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:46 pm
Posts: 97
Location: Toronto
maxpou wrote:
and not the IV resistor. It's the reason why i would like to use it.

The stage you posted uses an IV resistor - it's clearly marked in the stage you posted as Riv.

I'm willing to be corrected, and likely will, but you need an IV resistor somewhere in the stage to create the voltage using Ohm's Law. The rest of the circuit is a way to "move" the current around to reduce the load on the output of the DAC.

The only stage that I've used personally is based upon the same topology as the ezDac. I know it is from an app note as I've seen reference to it here in the forum, but I can no longer find the relevant post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 4:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 437
Hi,

maxpou wrote:
Hi guys,
I tried several hours to find an IV converter but I only found one for this DAC. Somebody can help me for this?
I would like to found a discrete iv without feedback and coupling cap. Thank you! Maxpou


Well, I cannot help on the discrete without coulping cap, but why don't you make your life easy and just use the new Burr Brown Diamond transistors (OPA860/861). These make for a very easy open loop design that acts as "current conveyor" into a suitable I/V resistor. With the BB Parts you have 7.8mA PP per output.

So you can use a 750 Ohm I/U resistor after each OPA861 to ground and use that directly as output, no additional buffering etc. You probably need to add some offset current on the output to keep the outputs at 0V for digital silence, but that is an easy job for a small CCS that gives most of the correction and a servo to deal with thermal drift etc while having minimal contribution otherwise.

Ciao T

_________________
Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but you don't know why.
Guruhood is when you know everything and everything works accordingly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:03 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2008 1:46 pm
Posts: 97
Location: Toronto
I just looked at the OPA861 datasheet again for about the twentieth time, and finally had the moment where I now understand how I can use it for IV. I knew it could be used, having seen reference to it in others work, but now I have an idea of how to do it.

Now just need to figure out the best way to do differential to SE.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 5:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 26, 2007 5:45 pm
Posts: 437
Hi,

erik_s wrote:
I just looked at the OPA861 datasheet again for about the twentieth time, and finally had the moment where I now understand how I can use it for IV. I knew it could be used, having seen reference to it in others work, but now I have an idea of how to do it.


Just think of it as a simple transistor. Ignore the complexity. Input current into the Emitter node, ground base, load resistor on collector.

erik_s wrote:
Now just need to figure out the best way to do differential to SE.


My suggestion would be to simply ignore it.

But if you must, you could also the OPA861 as Balanced/SE converter, as it has both inverting and non-inverting inputs. Just note that both have very different input impedances.

I think you can simulate this stuff using Tina-Ti.

Or you could use a 2:1 output transformer as the Balanced to SE converter, from the 4V RMS differential output at 1.5K to 2V RMS at around 400 Ohm.

Ciao T

_________________
Theory is when you know everything but nothing works.
Practice is when everything works but you don't know why.
Guruhood is when you know everything and everything works accordingly.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 5:33 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
Hi Guys,
thank you for your suggestions but I would like to have a real discrete i/v. I will work on the circuit and I will be comeback with the schematic. Maxpou


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 2:51 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
Hi guys,
I would like to know if my arrangement of jocko's circuit ( easy-to-built ) works. As I said in my first post I want built a iv converter without feedback and coupling cap in signal path. Maxpou


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2010 5:24 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun May 18, 2008 1:05 pm
Posts: 128
No comment on my schema? I would like to know if i'm correct or no? Maxpou


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 188 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 13  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: mkc and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group