gmarsh wrote:
I'm still wondering what's truly unique about these to qualify them as "audio grade". low ESR? low leakage?
And I reiterate my belief that if a component changes the sound of a circuit, it means one of two things:
- The component was improperly chosen, or
- The circuit that the component was put in was improperly designed or selected, making it overly sensitive to the characteristics of said component.
I'd start by describing what this capacitor is being used for.
That's certainly a wide brush you have. Either the parts or circuits aren't good enough or the job they're needed for is too tough for them? C'mon, in reality a lot of it comes down to compromise between least evils and nothing is ideal.
Don't forget either all coins are two faced SOBs. You could massage or tweak a circuit or system until it becomes unresponsive, sonically let's say, to a change in any one or even groups of parts. That wouldn't necessarily mean improved, but it could be the exact opposite.
You might even consider the more neutral and transparent it gets, the more sensitive it becomes to simple changes in components. Consider that if you did have the "perfect" circuit, any change at all would have to throw it out of equilibrium from perfection somehow.
So what's audiophile in a cap? Probably everything in a good one. Low ESR isn't written in gold but it should be reasonably lowish, good connections between leads and foil, how they go about etching the foils, the type of seperator iself by reason of damping and probably consistency, the type of endseal, and probably countless other little factors such as overall quality in and selection of materials. Most "audio grade" caps though, seem to have some extra gritt thrown in for additional damping which seems to make them better immune to signal related artifacts.... cerafine for, silmic and black gate for examples.