DIYHiFi.org

For the sake of audio
It is currently Sat May 18, 2013 6:06 pm

All times are UTC




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Nov 22, 2006 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:26 pm
Posts: 4652
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
Ok, I found something in Europe.
RS Components in Spain seems to be a good solution for me.
The price of the caps is much more expensive than on the US, but it's the cheapest I've found in Europe. Customs don't ask me for money, as this is the EU.
Btw, the VAT in Spain is only 16%. :idea:
Done.


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Carlos Filipe

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: 78L09 regulator
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 8:36 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:07 pm
Posts: 575
Location: So. California
carlosfm wrote:
Ok, I think it's done.
There are some IDs on the bottom layer now, and two options for regs.


Carlos or anyone:

I've finally got all the parts to build a Veroboard version of Carlos's reclocker. One potential SNAFU is that I accidentally ordered the SMD (TO-243) version of the 78L09 reg, not TO-92 (or larger). In the datasheet, Panasonic does not seem to diff. between the two WRT performance/elec. specs -- both can supposedly deliver 100mA. My question: can this small SMD reg. adequately power the mostly-through-hole-component-based reclocker circuit?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 9:27 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:26 pm
Posts: 4652
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
hollow_man wrote:
I've finally got all the parts to build a Veroboard version of Carlos's reclocker. One potential SNAFU is that I accidentally ordered the SMD (TO-243) version of the 78L09 reg, not TO-92 (or larger). In the datasheet, Panasonic does not seem to diff. between the two WRT performance/elec. specs -- both can supposedly deliver 100mA. My question: can this small SMD reg. adequately power the mostly-through-hole-component-based reclocker circuit?


If you are going to use 3 or 4 74HC74 chips I would recommend a TO220 reg.
Otherwise you should be ok with TO-92 or SMD.

_________________
Carlos Filipe

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:17 pm
Posts: 1095
Location: Portugal
carlosfm wrote:
Btw, the VAT in Spain is only 16%. :idea:

And if you give your VAT number, you can even be surprised with 0% VAT :good: (as you are an individual)
It happened to me in some orders from Spain, Deutchland and Netherlands

_________________
Pedro Martins

Playing with Canon EOS 5D mkII...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 10:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:07 pm
Posts: 575
Location: So. California
Thx for your reply ...
carlosfm wrote:
If you are going to use 3 or 4 74HC74 chips I would recommend a TO220 reg.
Otherwise you should be ok with TO-92 or SMD.

Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. I'm, initially, going to use only one 74HC74 as I want to reclock just the awful SPDIF line. The reason for that is that my current outboard DAC has a better I/V than that in my Philips CDB-650 CDP, which is mostly stock. But once the THS4032s arrive, I'll move to the Philips 650 for all-in-one CD playback. And I can't wait for that ;)!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Thu Dec 06, 2007 4:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 1:09 am
Posts: 127
Location: Chicago
peufeu wrote:
The nice thing about the Net is that you don't need to bother with ordering PCBs from a fab, just post it on diy audio, wait a few weeks and then you will be able to order it from some swedish site :mrgreen:

Hehe... I hadn't read this entire thread... made my morning :P


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 20, 2008 8:45 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:07 pm
Posts: 575
Location: So. California
Carlos: re your PCB reclocking module in this thread ... I assume the BCK buffer (the first 74HC74 on the board with the BCK label) is there just for generic convenience or NOS. I'm pretty sure that with your Philips CD-160 you're not using the garbage spewed out by the SAA7220 and, instead, using a clean clock divided by two -- correct?

As far as divide-by-two circuits, someone (perhaps you) recommended the low-skew Tom Napier design. Anything better than this?

Thx,
-h_m


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 12:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:26 pm
Posts: 4652
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
hollow_man wrote:
Carlos: re your PCB reclocking module in this thread ... I assume the BCK buffer (the first 74HC74 on the board with the BCK label) is there just for generic convenience or NOS. I'm pretty sure that with your Philips CD-160 you're not using the garbage spewed out by the SAA7220 and, instead, using a clean clock divided by two -- correct?


Yes, I'm using divide by 2 directly from the clock.
In this board the first 74HC74 is used for BCK reclocking but you can easily cange it for divide by 2 by shunting pins 2 to 5.

hollow_man wrote:
As far as divide-by-two circuits, someone (perhaps you) recommended the low-skew Tom Napier design. Anything better than this?


Better, why? Doesn't it work well?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Carlos Filipe

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 1:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:07 pm
Posts: 575
Location: So. California
carlosfm wrote:
hollow_man wrote:
As far as divide-by-two circuits, someone (perhaps you) recommended the low-skew Tom Napier design. Anything better than this?

Better, why? Doesn't it work well?
Because the Napier design has been out for a while, I'm always on the lookout for "new and improved"! Yup -- I do know about Tent's divide-by-2 that you attached. In fact, I'm using Tent's PS/decoupling suggestions -- ferrite bead, 10uF cap --for the Napier design.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 4:13 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2006 5:10 am
Posts: 388
Location: Montreal
Note the error in Guido's schematic: pins 2 and 6 should be connected togheter (not 2 and 5) !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 21, 2008 11:28 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:26 pm
Posts: 4652
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
sidiy wrote:
Note the error in Guido's schematic: pins 2 and 6 should be connected togheter (not 2 and 5) !


Ops... yes, that's right.

_________________
Carlos Filipe

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 5:14 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:55 pm
Posts: 1
Hi Carlos --

Just a quick note to say thanks for the board design. I built a version of it, using 3 PLLs and a couple component changes, to use with Guido's XO-DAC in my PCM2707->TDA1541A DAC.

Credit where credit is due, and I appreciate you making your IP available here for others to borrow at will.

Best Regards,
John


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 7:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:26 pm
Posts: 4652
Location: Lisbon, Portugal
nullspace wrote:
Credit where credit is due, and I appreciate you making your IP available here for others to borrow at will.


Thanks for your kind words, John.
Several members here have made suggestions to the final layout, so this is open for all to use at will, there's no IP here and nothing new, it's a simple reclock module, which may be handy in many situations.
Use and enjoy.

_________________
Carlos Filipe

"Any intelligent fool can make things bigger, more complex, and more violent. It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage - to move in the opposite direction." Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 06, 2008 8:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 23, 2007 11:07 pm
Posts: 575
Location: So. California
carlosfm wrote:
nullspace wrote:
Credit where credit is due, and I appreciate you making your IP available here for others to borrow at will.


... it's a simple reclock module, which may be handy in many situations.
Use and enjoy.

This unit has worked v. well for me! So has Elso's KC, which couples nicely with Carlos' reclocker.

I personally don't see any reason to buy one of the for-sale modules. Maybe they are a tad better (??) but you don't learn anything with them. The DIY designs evolve and improve over time, too.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 08, 2008 8:03 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 27, 2007 3:43 pm
Posts: 25
Image

Image

I have done this CI to install it under a CD/DVD ROM drive .

To day the 75176 is replaced by a LTC 485 ( better signals) ,the " SPDIF output is a differential TX+,TX- link charged by a 150R .

I check it with a PLEXTOR 130A DVD drive .
The Oscillator is a TENT 33,... Mhz ,the regulators are Audiocom vers 1 regulators ,capas are
OSCON
I have good results :yahoo:

Serge


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 64 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], jdlvfr and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group